Monday, 14 September 2009

Bonzo Dog Dooh dah band

No Matter Who You Vote For,
The Government Always Gets In (Innes/Stanshall)

BONNGGGG Preside! Hear, hear, hear! Might I remind you...Say it... Order!Might I remind you...

(Heigh ho!) No!OOORDERRRR!!! Noises on the radio Megaphones on cars

Sermons from the Street of Shame Know-it-alls in bars

Posters in suburbia Experts on t.v. Don't let them disturb-i-ya They're just the powers that be

Heigh ho! Don't worry Nobody can win (Heigh ho! Heigh ho!)

No matter who you vote for, the government always gets in!

Heigh ho! riiiiinnng!!! (yaaaawn)

Oh, great, great slumbering nation cock-a-doodle-doo! Awake! Set yourself free!

Oh, smell the comforting bacon Taste the bromide tea sluuuuurrrrp aahhh! An' give a little chirrup as I ladle on the syrup

Promises are cheap Let me bear your crosses

Make me Boss of Bosses Then you go back to sleep! ha ha ha...

Heigh ho! Don't worry Pop your cross in the bin (Heigh ho! Heigh ho!)

No matter who matter who you vote for, the Government always gets in!
Heigh ho! Heigh ho! Heigh ho! Heigh ho! Men have dreams of a finer place Incorruptible

Shangri-la Women too have their Shangri-Las Shangri-La la la!

See them in the public eye Oozing oily charm

Hear them all personify " Down on Animal Farm" oink oink moooo!!

Dog eat dog, not cock and bull Isms are the game Ism this and ism that Ism it a shame?

Heigh ho! Don't worry Nobody can win (Heigh ho! Heigh ho!)

No matter who you vote for, the Government always gets in gobble gobble gobble
Heigh ho! Don't worry Pop your cross in the bin (Heigh ho! Heigh ho!)

No matter who you vote for, the Government always gets in (Heigh ho! Heigh ho!)

Don't worry You know you can't win (Heigh ho! Heigh ho!)

No matter who you vote for, the Government always gets in (Heigh ho! Heigh ho!) (Heigh ho!) Pop your cross in the bin (Heigh ho! Heigh ho!) (Heigh ho!)

The Government always gets in (Heigh ho! Heigh ho! Heigh ho!) (Heigh ho!) Pop your cross in the bin (Heigh ho! Heigh ho!)

Monday, 7 September 2009

Is this what our presence in Afghanistan is all about?

I saw this article on line , and I feel that nothing about this pipeline is mentioned or discussed in the British press . The Nabucco project is a huge undertaking , part of this pipeline will run through Kandahar !!

Will the construction of this pipeline through Afghanistan ensure peace and jobs for the citizens of that country, and will the proposed Nabucco project bring stability to those regions? I feel that the article below is such worth while reading and so revealing, it does show that there are some exciting projects that can lift these countries up economically .

It is about time our troops came home , don't you agree?

The politics of pipelines

By Tariq Fatemi
Some 10 years ago, the federal cabinet was examining the possibility of selling surplus power to India. Today, thanks to the Musharraf regime’s criminal neglect of this sector, we are facing a crippling power shortage.
Islamabad has little to show for its efforts to secure energy sources over the years, apart from signing numerous memorandums of understanding.
As far back as 1993, an MOU was signed to construct the Iran-Pakistan gas pipeline project that India later wanted to join. It envisaged a 2,670km land pipeline with a 3,620 mmcfd gas transmission capacity.
A year later, an MoU was signed to bring gas from Turkmenistan through Afghanistan. In 2002 an agreement envisaging a pipeline over 1,271km up to Multan was also signed. It enjoyed US support, but continuing turmoil in Afghanistan, coupled with Turkmenistan’s inability to provide convincing proof of its gas reserves, is preventing progress. Then there is the Qatar-Pakistan pipeline under consideration since April 1992.

Many experts are convinced that it is only the IPI project that is technically viable and economically attractive. But US opposition has prevented any concrete movement on it. In the past year or so, India has lost some of its ardour for it, partly because of the US civilian nuclear deal and partly because of the high price demanded by Iran.

The 3,300km Nabucco project, signed by Turkey, Austria, Bulgaria, Romania and Hungary, is estimated to cost $11bn and is projected to transport Central Asian gas bypassing Russia, going via Turkey to Austria and Germany through Bulgaria, Romania and Hungary. With four entry points into Turkey, it will ultimately tap gas from diverse sources and pump enough gas to meet five to 10 per cent of the European Union’s needs.

However, it is Iran’s involvement that makes the Nabucco pipeline so intriguing, for it will make it the transit corridor for Turkmenistan gas that will eventually go into the pipeline. For this, Iran has entered into an arrangement with Turkmenistan, with the two agreeing that instead of constructing a pipeline from Turkmenistan along the bottom of the Caspian Sea, they would transport Turkmen gas to Europe via existing pipelines to Turkey.

This means that Tehran has decided that while Washington explores how to rebuild relations with it, it can forge a strategic partnership with Europe, a view confirmed by the Turkish energy minister.
The Nabucco project represents a setback for Russia, as it will enable Europe to diversify its energy supplies. This explains why it had been promoting the South Stream project as an alternative to Nabucco, persuading the Balkan and Central European countries to opt for it. It may also mean that Turkmenistan is moving away from Russia and getting closer to the US, which could transform the Caspian energy sweepstakes.

With Russian gas supplies dwindling and surplus for export shrinking, Gazprom is even more dependent on Turkmenistan which currently produces 80,000mmcfd annually out of which most is sold to Russia. However, in recent months, supplies to Russia have been cut back sharply, because of an explosion on the Soviet-era Central Asia-Centre pipeline.

In the meanwhile, Turkmenistan has also agreed to increase its contracted gas supplies to China via a pipeline nearing completion. In addition, Turkmenistan has agreed to step up gas supplies for the Nabucco pipeline, which means that Turkmenistan intends to reduce its dependence on Russia. This could encourage other Central Asian energy producers to move away from Russia and opt for European markets through pipelines not going through Russian territory.
This means that Turkey is fast becoming the ideal transit country to carry non-Russian gas from Egypt, Iraq, Iran, Turkmenistan, Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan to Europe, thereby assuming the role of an energy hub for Europe. But Turkey is careful not to antagonise Russia, a neighbour, top trading partner and main gas supplier.

Turkey is already linked directly to Russia through the Blue Stream gas pipeline, which runs under the Black Sea. Hoping to attract Russia and Kazakh oil, Ankara is promoting a pipeline from its Black Sea port of Samsun to Ceyhan on the Mediterranean coast, which already serves us a terminal for conduits pumping oil from Azerbaijan via Iraq.

While the world’s powerful states are scrambling to acquire secure sources of energy, we have failed to move on even one pipeline project, which only shows how oblivious our leadership has been to the country’s increasingly desperate need for energy. (Mr Tariq Fatemi is former ambassador to USA and a senior foreign affairs analyst. His article first appeared in the Dawn)